De Peyster v. Michael
Court of Appeals of New York
6 N.Y. 467 (1852)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Van Rensselaer (lessor) leased a parcel of land to Snyder (lessee) with a condition on the lease that whenever lessee sold the land, the lessor, his heirs, and assigns should receive one quarter of the sale price. De Peyster (plaintiff) is the assignee of the lessor and Michael (defendant) is the assignee of the lessee. A portion of the land in question was sold to Michael, but De Peyster was never paid one quarter of that sale price. As a result, De Peyster brought action to recover the land from Michael as was the remedy contemplated in the original lease. The circuit court ruled in favor of Michael, stating that the one quarter sale provision was void, and the state supreme court affirmed. De Peyster appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ruggles, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.