From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
De Sylva v. Ballentine
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 570, 76 S. Ct. 974, 100 L. Ed. 1415 (1956)
Marie De Sylva (defendant) was the widow of an author who had copyrights on several musical compositions. Marie Ballentine (plaintiff) was the mother of the author’s illegitimate child. Both Ballentine and De Sylva lived in California. Under § 24 of the Copyright Act (the act), copyrights lasted for 28 years and could be renewed for a second 28-year period. If the author of the copyrighted work was dead, the act provided that the widow, widower, or children of the author could renew the author’s copyrights. The act did not specify whether illegitimate children were considered children. Ballentine filed a lawsuit against De Sylva in federal district court seeking a declaratory judgment that Ballentine’s child had an interest in the author’s copyrights. The district court held that Ballentine’s child was a child of the author under copyright law but that the renewal rights to the copyrights belonged exclusively to De Sylva. In reaching its holding, the district court reasoned that the categories of persons who could have an interest in renewal rights—widows, widowers, or children—were specifically listed in the order that exclusive renewal rights should be granted. The court of appeals agreed that Ballentine’s child was a child of the author under the act and held that the child and De Sylva were to share their interest in the renewal rights. De Sylva appealed, arguing that Ballentine’s child was not a child of the author under the act because the child was illegitimate. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
Concurrence (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.