Dearborn v. Everett J. Prescott, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
486 F. Supp. 2d 802 (2007)
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Christopher J. Dearborn (plaintiff), an Indiana resident, worked for Everett J. Prescott, Inc. (EJP) (defendant), a Maine corporation with its principal place of business in Maine, in sales out of EJP’s Indiana office. Dearborn left EJP after 10 years, accepting a position with an EJP competitor, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. (Ferguson). Two years earlier, EJP had required Dearborn to sign a noncompetition agreement. The noncompetition agreement contained a Maine choice-of-law provision. Employees were paid $250 as consideration for the agreement, and the agreements broadly restricted employees from working for a competitor for three years after their employment with EJP in any geographic area within 100 miles of EJP offices, distribution centers, or any other EJP place of business. After Dearborn began working for Ferguson, EJP sent him a cease-and-desist letter, but the demands in the letter were narrower in scope than the noncompetition agreement. Dearborn filed suit in federal district court in Indiana, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief barring EJP from enforcing the noncompetition agreement. Under Maine law, if a former employer only sought to enforce a portion of a noncompetition agreement, the court would consider whether that portion of the noncompetition agreement was enforceable. Under Indiana law, the court looked at the noncompetition agreement as a whole to determine its enforceability, regardless of whether the employer only sought to enforce a narrower scope of the restrictions. EJP moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent Dearborn from working for Ferguson, arguing that Maine law applied.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.