United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
644 F.2d 397 (1981)
The State of Florida passed a statute requiring a student to pass a competency examination covering certain basic skills to receive a high-school diploma. This examination was called the Florida State Student Assessment Test, or the SSAT II. Florida conducted several studies regarding the test, including a content-validity study. However, witnesses testified that the Florida Department of Education assumed that certain things were being taught in the classroom. A teacher testified that he did not cover the entire textbook for the subject in his class. When the test was given, many students passed. However, a significant number of students, including a large proportion of black students, failed. A class action was filed on behalf of the failing students (plaintiffs) against the State of Florida, alleging that the test violated the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial court ruled in favor of Florida, and the plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Fay, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.