Decker v. Circus Circus Hotel

49 F.Supp.2d 743 (1999)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Decker v. Circus Circus Hotel

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
49 F.Supp.2d 743 (1999)

RW

Facts

Janice and Robert Decker (plaintiffs) sued the Circus Circus Hotel (hotel) (defendant), a Nevada corporation, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The hotel did not advertise or specifically seek guests from New Jersey; did not own property, pay taxes, or maintain offices, agents, or bank accounts in New Jersey; and had no plans to do so. The Deckers contended that the court had personal jurisdiction over the hotel because the hotel was related to corporations that did business in New Jersey; maintained an interactive website through which it formed contracts, governed by Nevada law, with New Jerseyans; conducted nationwide media campaigns that reached New Jerseyans; and mailed promotional material to New Jerseyans who were former hotel guests or who requested the material. The hotel contended that it never purposefully availed itself of the benefits and protection of New Jersey law and therefore moved to either dismiss the case or transfer it to Nevada.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walls, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership