From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...
Deep Water Brewing, LLC v. Fairway Resources Limited
Washington Court of Appeals
215 P.3d 990 (2009)
The Kenagys (plaintiffs) purchased a restaurant overlooking a lake from Cindy Smith and her brother Robert Ahlquist. The Kenagys then leased the restaurant to their company, Deep Water Brewing, LLC (plaintiff). Jack Johnson, president of Key Development Corporation (defendant) and David Milne, president of Fairway Resources, Limited (defendant) (collectively Defendants) wanted to develop the land between the restaurant and the lake into single-family homes. Prior to the transfer of the restaurant to the Kenagys, Ahlquist executed an easement and right-of-way agreement that (1) allowed Defendants access across the restaurant property to begin the development and (2) placed a restrictive covenant prohibiting any constructed house to obscure the view of the lake from the restaurant’s first-floor lounge. Additionally, the agreement required the establishment of a Homeowners Association (HOA) (defendant) to protect the rights of Ahlquist. Johnson named himself President of the HOA, but failed to disclose the agreements to subsequent home builders. Further, Johnson permitted “maximum height levels” of homes to be built so as to obscure the view of the lake from the first-floor lounge. The Kenagys brought suit against Defendants for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to enforce the provisions of the easement and agreement that protected their view of the lake. The Kenagys later added Michael and Patricia Taylor as defendants. The Taylors had begun construction of a two-story home, approved by Johnson and the HOA, which significantly obscured the view of the lake from the restaurant. The trial court held that Defendants breached the initial agreement with Ahlquist and that the HOA and Johnson had tortiously interfered with the agreement and imposed a judgment of $245,000 in favor of Plaintiffs. The trial court further held that the Taylors were bona fide purchasers without notice and were therefore not liable to the Kenagys. Defendants, other than the Taylors, appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sweeney, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.