Defenders of Wildlife v. Bernal

204 F.3d 920 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Bernal

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
204 F.3d 920 (2000)

Facts

The Amphitheater School District (school district) (defendant) was a school district in Tucson, Arizona, that needed to build a new high school. The school district acquired a 73-acre piece of property for the new school site. After the school district had purchased the property, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issued a rule that placed the pygmy owl on the endangered species list under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The FWS’s final rule on the pygmy owl identified the types of land that amounted to critical habitats for the owl. The school site included 30 acres of land that fit into this critical-habitat criteria. Although the school district had originally planned to develop part of those 30 acres in building the school, the district adjusted their plans and acquired more adjacent property so that the 30 acres that amounted to owl critical habitat could remain undeveloped. When the school district began to move forward with the development of the school site, the Defenders of Wildlife (Defenders) (plaintiff) sued the school district in federal court, alleging that the proposed construction amounted to a taking of the pygmy owl in violation of the ESA. After granting a temporary injunction against development of the school site, the district court eventually held for the school district, denying the Defenders’ request for a permanent injunction and lifting the temporary injunction. The Defenders appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hug, C.J.)

Concurrence (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership