Defenders of Wildlife v. Bernal
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
204 F.3d 920 (2000)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
The Amphitheater School District (school district) (defendant) was a school district in Tucson, Arizona, that needed to build a new high school. The school district acquired a 73-acre piece of property for the new school site. After the school district had purchased the property, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issued a rule that placed the pygmy owl on the endangered species list under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The FWS’s final rule on the pygmy owl identified the types of land that amounted to critical habitats for the owl. The school site included 30 acres of land that fit into this critical-habitat criteria. Although the school district had originally planned to develop part of those 30 acres in building the school, the district adjusted their plans and acquired more adjacent property so that the 30 acres that amounted to owl critical habitat could remain undeveloped. When the school district began to move forward with the development of the school site, the Defenders of Wildlife (Defenders) (plaintiff) sued the school district in federal court, alleging that the proposed construction amounted to a taking of the pygmy owl in violation of the ESA. After granting a temporary injunction against development of the school site, the district court eventually held for the school district, denying the Defenders’ request for a permanent injunction and lifting the temporary injunction. The Defenders appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hug, C.J.)
Concurrence (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.