Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell
United States District Court for the Central District of California
2014 WL 1364452 (2014)
- Written by Tanya Munson, JD
Facts
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (defendant) had approved the construction of four large-scale solar-energy development projects on federal lands. The projects would contribute to California’s clean and renewable energy initiatives. The projects were located on land that had been habitats for a species of desert tortoise that was native to the Mojave Desert and listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Two of the development projects had already been constructed, and construction of the other two was planned. Defenders of Wildlife (Defenders) (plaintiff) filed suit in district court, seeking a preliminary injunction to enjoin the construction of the proposed projects. Defenders argued that the desert tortoise had a “continuous distribution genetic structure” and that population connectivity was crucial to the species and that unfragmented habitats were important for population-density recovery. Thus, Defenders argued the two projects should not be constructed because of the detrimental effects they would have on desert tortoise habitat connectivity.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fitzgerald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.