Defrantz v. United States Olympic Committee (USOC)
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
492 F.Supp. 1181 (1980)
Twenty-five athletes, including Defrantz, and one member of the Executive Board (plaintiffs) of the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) (defendant) brought suit to prevent the USOC from carrying out a decision not to send American athletes to compete in the 1980 Olympic Games in Moscow. Under the Amateur Sports Act of 1978, the USOC is charged with overseeing all matters related to U.S. participation in the Olympic Games. President Carter put great pressure on the USOC not to send a team to the Games, including threatening to withhold federal funding, to revoke the USOC’s tax exemption, and to invoke federal law to prevent American athletics from competing in the Games. Plaintiffs allege that in preventing an American team from competing in the Games, the USOC has exceeded its statutory powers and infringed upon the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pratt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.