DeFunis v. Odegaard
United States Supreme Court
416 U.S. 312, 94 S.Ct. 1704, 40 L.Ed.2d 164 (1974)
Marco DeFunis (plaintiff) challenged the admissions process of the University of Washington Law School (defendant), claiming that the University's admissions policies and criteria discriminated against him on the basis of his race in violation of the Equal Protection Clause. DeFunis sought, and was awarded, an injunction in state court requiring his admission to the University. The Washington Supreme Court reversed, but the judgment was stayed pending DeFunis’s appeal to the United States Supreme Court. At the time the matter was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, DeFunis was in his final term of law school, and the University agreed that DeFunis’s registration for his final term would not be canceled regardless of the Court’s decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.