DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers

491 F.Supp. 1276, aff'd 654 F.2d 280 (1980), 454 U.S. 1085, 102 S.Ct. 642 (1981)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
D
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
491 F.Supp. 1276, aff'd 654 F.2d 280 (1980), 454 U.S. 1085, 102 S.Ct. 642 (1981)

Facts

Joseph DeJames (plaintiff) sustained injuries while working on a ship in New Jersey. The ship was chartered by Magnificence Carriers, Inc. and had been defectively converted into an automobile carrier in Japan by Hitachi Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, Ltd. (defendants). DeJames sued the defendants in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey under 28 U.S.C. § 1333 to recover damages for his injuries. Hitachi was served with process in Japan pursuant to New Jersey’s long-arm statute. Hitachi moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction because it did not have sufficient contacts with the State of New Jersey. In response, DeJames argued that Hitachi’s contacts with the entire United States could be aggregated because DeJames brought this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in federal court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Civil Procedure

Key Terms

Related Videos