Del Bosque v. AT&T Advertising

2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19280 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Del Bosque v. AT&T Advertising

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19280 (2011)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Sylvia Del Bosque (plaintiff) was an employee of AT&T Advertising (AT&T) (defendant). In May 2008, Del Bosque sued AT&T for race- and sex-based discrimination and retaliation. The parties attended a mediation on November 18, 2008, and continued settlement discussions for several days afterward. Del Bosque was represented by counsel throughout the process. On November 22, 2008, Del Bosque and her counsel signed a settlement agreement in which Del Bosque would receive an amount of money in exchange for dismissing the case. Subsequently, Del Bosque filed a pro se motion to revoke the settlement based on claims of duress and incompetency or incapacity, while AT&T filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement and for case dismissal. AT&T submitted affidavits in support of its motions. At the motion hearing, the court seemingly considered the statements of Del Bosque, her mediation attorney, and AT&T’s attorney as evidence. Del Bosque presented the district court with a signed, unsworn letter from a nurse (the health letter), which stated that due to Del Bosque’s “recent worsening condition, she may not have been in the best medical condition to enter into a legal agreement.” Del Bosque stated that she was “distraught” during the mediation and did not feel like she had enough time to consider the settlement, despite admittedly having a weekend to review it and the assistance of counsel. Del Bosque also explained that she had expected a resolution of the facts either concurrently with or before any settlement. The court heard and considered Del Bosque’s concerns and decided to enforce the settlement agreement and dismiss the case. Del Bosque appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership