Delair v. McAdoo
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
188 A. 181 (1936)
McAdoo (defendant) was passing Delair (plaintiff) in his car when McAdoo's left rear tire blew out. McAdoo’s car swerved and crashed into Delair’s car. Delair sued McAdoo, arguing that McAdoo acted negligently by driving with defective tires. Testimony at trial revealed that the tire was worn to the point that the tread or inner lining of the tire was visible. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Delair for $7,500. McAdoo moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict but granted the motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages awarded were excessive. McAdoo appealed the denial of his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kephart, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.