Delaware Tribal Business Committee v. Weeks
United States Supreme Court
430 U.S. 73 (1977)
- Written by Matthew Celestin, JD
Facts
The Delaware Indians were historically a single tribe, but they eventually split into four groups: the Cherokee, Absentee, Munsee, and Kansas Delawares. The Cherokee and Absentee were federally recognized Indian tribes. In 1866, the Kansas Delawares accepted individual parcels of land and United States citizenship from the government, and therefore, the descendants of the Kansas Delawares were no longer members of a federally recognized tribe. The Indian Claims Commission (the commission) awarded a judgment to the descendants of the Delawares to compensate the Delaware tribe for the government’s breach of a treaty, but under Congress’s distribution plan, the award was to be distributed only to the Cherokee and Absentee descendants (the award recipients), as members of the only two federally recognized tribes. Weeks (plaintiff) filed suit in a federal district court on behalf of the Kansas Delawares against the secretary of the interior (the secretary) (defendant) and the award recipients (defendants), alleging that the Kansas Delawares’ exclusion from distribution of the judgment award denied them equal protection under the Due Process Clause. The district court agreed, and the secretary and the award recipients appealed. The award recipients argued that Congress had absolute, or plenary, power to decide Indian affairs and therefore that Congress’s decision was not subject to judicial scrutiny. The secretary argued that Congress’s plenary power was not absolute and may be subject to judicial scrutiny. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.