Dell Products LP v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
642 F.3d 1055 (2011)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Dell Products LP (Dell) (plaintiff) imported laptop computers and add-on products such as secondary batteries. The laptop computers were imported together with a primary battery and charging cable, and the secondary batteries were imported separately. United States Customs and Border Protection (customs) (defendant) classified the secondary batteries as other storage batteries under subheading 8507.80.80 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which subjected imports to a 3.4 percent duty. Dell challenged the classification, arguing that because it sold its secondary batteries as sets with its laptop computers, the secondary batteries must be classified as portable digital automatic data-processing machines under subheading 8471.30.00, a duty-free classification. The Court of International Trade held that the secondary batteries were not part of a set as set out in General Rule of Interpretation (GRI) 3(b), but rather an add-on product, and thus properly classified under subheading 8507.80.80. Dell appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.