Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. Wood

766 S.W.2d 424 (1989)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. Wood

Arkansas Supreme Court

766 S.W.2d 424 (1989)

Facts

Steve McCray (defendant) was the president of Delta School of Commerce, Inc. (Delta) (defendant), a school that offered a nursing-assistant program. Earlene Wood (plaintiff) was interested in Delta’s nursing-assistant program and made an appointment to discuss the program with McCray. During the appointment, Wood asked McCray if a nursing assistant was the same as a nurse’s aide. McCray told her that it was not, the state of Arkansas was phasing out licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and replacing them with nursing assistants, and the pay for a nursing assistant would be similar to an LPN’s pay. Based on McCray’s statements, Wood enrolled in Delta’s nursing-assistant program, taking out a student loan to pay her tuition. Wood dropped out of the program upon discovering that nursing assistants were in fact the same as nurse’s aides. Wood was learning to empty bedpans, make beds, and take vitals. In contrast, an LPN learns to assist in surgery and administer medications. Wood sued McCray and Delta for fraudulently inducing her to enroll in Delta’s nursing-assistant program. During trial, McCray denied telling Wood that nursing assistants would take the place of LPNs, but he claimed to have heard it questioned whether or not LPNs were being phased out. Maxine Ottey, director of nursing practice with the Arkansas Board of Nursing, testified that LPNs certainly could not be replaced with nursing assistants. Following trial, the jury found in Wood’s favor, awarding her the cost of her tuition in compensatory damages and $50,000 in punitive damages. Delta and McCray appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holt, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership