Demasse v. ITT Corporation
Arizona Supreme Court
984 P.2d 1138 (1999)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Between 1960 and 1979, ITT Corporation (defendant) hired numerous employees in Arizona, including Roger Demasse and five others (the employees) (plaintiffs) and gave them an employee handbook stating any layoffs would be based on seniority. In 1989, ITT issued a new handbook saying it could change its policies at any time. In 1993, ITT changed its layoff policy, saying that any layoffs would now be based on performance instead of seniority. The six employees were then laid off before less-senior workers. The employees sued ITT in federal district court, claiming the original handbook created a contract requiring seniority-based layoffs. The district court granted summary judgment to ITT. The employees appealed. The Ninth Circuit certified a question to the Arizona Supreme Court, seeking guidance about the state's contract-modification laws.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Jones, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 924,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


