Demers v. Rosa
Connecticut Court of Appeals
925 A.2d 1165 (2007)
On a snowy day, two police officers, Edward Demers and Alton Cronin, responded to a complaint of a roaming dog. The dog’s owner, Steven Rosa, frequently allowed his dogs to roam, resulting in complaints from local residents. Cronin captured the dog and placed it in the back of his patrol car. While Demers was standing next to Cronin’s patrol car and speaking with Cronin, Demers slipped and fell, sustaining injuries. Demers (plaintiff) sued Rosa (defendant), arguing that his injuries were caused by Rosa negligently permitting the dog to roam. The trial court awarded judgment in favor of Demers, holding that it was reasonably foreseeable that negligently allowing a dog to roam would result in complaints to the police department, and that an officer might be injured during the course of responding to those complaints. Rosa appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harper, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.