Demiraj v. Holder

631 F.3d 194 (2011)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Demiraj v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
631 F.3d 194 (2011)

Facts

Edmond Demiraj was an Albanian national who was identified by the United States (defendant) as a material witness against Bill Bedini, an Albanian who was wanted in the United States for human trafficking. Bedini kidnapped, beat, and shot Edmond in Albania because of Edmond’s cooperation with United States authorities. Edmond fled to the United States and was eventually granted withholding of removal. Prior to this, Edmond’s wife, Rudina Demiraj (plaintiff) and minor son had also fled to the United States and sought asylum, on the basis of Rudina’s family’s political opposition to Albania’s former communist regime. This application was denied, but Rudina was granted leave by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to reopen her case after Bedini shot her husband. Rudina’s new petition for asylum for herself and her son was based on her claims that Bedini and his associates had begun a blood feud against Edmond that threatened everyone in their family. Rudina provided evidence that Bedini had in fact recently kidnapped two of Edmond’s nieces and trafficked them to Italy, before they escaped and fled to the United States. The immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals held that Rudina was not entitled to asylum, however, because she had not established the required nexus linking the persecution to membership in a particular social group. After a number of proceedings and various appeals, the matter came before the court of appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haynes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership