From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...
Dennis v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
105 Md. App. 687 (1995)
John Dennis (defendant) was married to Robin, and they had a 12-year-old son. In June, after Dennis and Robin began experiencing financial difficulties, Robin decided to leave. Robin moved in with Bantz and began having an affair. Dennis was upset at this news, partially because Dennis was aware that Bantz was involved in drugs. Dennis asked Robin to return home on several occasions and also threatened Bantz. However, by early August, Dennis began to accept the situation and focused on raising their son. Later in August, Robin told Dennis that the affair was over, and she was interested in coming home. Robin spent a couple of nights with Dennis but wasn’t sure if she was ready to come back. During that week, their son spent the night with Robin at Bantz’s home. The next day, Dennis learned that Bantz was also present and smoked cocaine in front of their son. Dennis then left his home and went to Bantz’s house with a handgun. When he got there, he saw Robin and Bantz together, hugging and partially undressed. Dennis believed they were about to have sex. Dennis kicked in the front door and shot Bantz nine times, killing him. The State of Maryland (plaintiff) charged Dennis with premeditated first-degree murder. After the trial, Dennis requested the trial court provide an instruction on manslaughter. The instruction provided that the provocation, based on the evidence in the trial, had to be based on the sudden discovery by Dennis of Robin in the act of sexual intercourse or having strong reason to believe that it recently took place. The jury convicted Dennis of premediated first-degree murder. Dennis appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wilner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.