Denny v. Mertz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
84 Wis. 2d 654, 267 N.W.2d 304 (1978)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
William Denny (plaintiff) worked for Koehring Company for about 15 years as an attorney, after which he resigned to go into private practice. He was also a major shareholder of Koehring. Orville Mertz (defendant) was an executive for Koehring for many years, and he eventually became CEO. Denny and other shareholders spoke critically to Koehring’s board of directors about Mertz’s performance as CEO. Mertz was eventually terminated. Business Week published an article about the change in management after Mertz’s termination. The article stated that Mertz claimed he had been harassed by Denny after Mertz fired Denny. Denny sued Mertz and McGraw-Hill, Inc. (defendant), the publisher of Business Week, for libel for publishing the statement that Mertz had fired Denny. Mertz and McGraw-Hill, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. They argued that “fired” was a neutral term that carried no negative connotations and did not imply that the firing was for incompetence or any particular reason. They also argued that the article in general painted Mertz, not Denny, in a negative light. The trial court denied the motion, and Mertz and McGraw-Hill appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Day, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
