Denson v. Donald J. Trump for President
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
530 F. Supp. 3d 412 (2021)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Jessica Denson (plaintiff) worked for the Donald J. Trump for President campaign (the campaign) (defendant). Denson signed an employment agreement containing a nondisclosure clause (NDA) that was unlimited in duration and that barred Denson from disclosing any confidential information related to Trump, Trump’s campaign, Trump’s companies and assets, or Trump’s family. Confidential information was defined to include any information that was either actually confidential or that Trump wanted to remain confidential. After Denson left the campaign, the campaign filed an arbitration petition in state court alleging that Denson had breached the NDA. Denson filed a complaint in federal district seeking a declaratory judgment that the NDA was invalid and unenforceable. The campaign attempted to arbitrate Denson’s complaint but was unsuccessful. Denson moved for summary judgment in district court, arguing that the NDA was vague, overbroad, and overly burdensome. The campaign countered, arguing that the NDA was tailored to protect the campaign’s legitimate interest in keeping the campaign’s information, communications, and strategies private. Alternatively, the campaign argued that the court should amend the NDA rather than invalidate it.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gardephe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.