Department of Children & Families Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. E.D.-O.
New Jersey Supreme Court
121 A.3d 832 (2015)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
E.D.-O. (defendant) left her 19-month-old child S.O. asleep in her car seat while E.D.-O. went into a store. E.D.-O. parked 150 feet away from the store, where she could see the car from inside; cracked both front windows; left the car running; and locked the car’s doors. It was about 55 degrees outside, and E.D.-O. was in the store for approximately 10 minutes. A security guard noticed the car running, saw the child, and called police. The Department of Children and Families, Division of Child Protection and Permanency (plaintiff) sent a caseworker to E.D.-O.’s home. E.D.-O. cried during her interview, said she had never left S.O. or any of her other children unattended in a car, and her husband said the same thing. The caseworker noted the house was clean, with appropriate bedrooms and food for the family, and S.O. had appropriate clothes and appeared well-nurtured. The caseworker nonetheless substantiated the neglect charges, and the division filed a petitioner seeking care and supervision of E.D.-O.’s four children. E.D.-O. appealed, but the division summarily affirmed the finding of neglect and denied E.D.-O.’s request for a hearing. The appellate court also affirmed, and E.D.-O. appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cuff, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.