Department of Natural Resources v. Indiana Coal Council, Inc

542 N.E.2d 1000 (1989)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Department of Natural Resources v. Indiana Coal Council, Inc

Indiana Supreme Court
542 N.E.2d 1000 (1989)

KL

Facts

Huntington Machinery & Equipment Rental, Inc. (HUMER) (plaintiff) owned a 305-acre parcel of land in Indiana containing approximately 1.537 million tons of mineable coal. An approximately 6.57-acre portion of the land was known as the Beehunter Site, an archaeologically significant area rich in cultural artifacts on which HUMER conducted farming activities. The Wabash Valley Archaeological Society (Wabash) petitioned the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (collectively, defendants) to have the Beehunter Site declared unsuitable for coal mining due to its cultural significance. HUMER and the Indiana Coal Council (council) (plaintiff) objected, but DNR designated the Beehunter Site unsuitable for surface coal mining. HUMER still retained ownership rights to the land and could use it for farming or other purposes. HUMER and the council sued Wabash and DNR, arguing that the land-use limitation amounted to an unconstitutional taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The district court ruled for HUMER and the council, and Wabash and DNR appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (DeBruler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership