Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads
United States Supreme Court
575 U.S. 43 (2015)
- Written by Jack Newell, JD
Facts
Congress passed the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA) in order to streamline passenger-rail transportation. PRIIA included a number of standards that rail carriers were required to adhere to, including a cap on the duration of delays in each trip. Congress put Amtrak partially in charge of enforcing these rules. Amtrak could do so easily because it shared the tracks with the freight lines it regulated. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) (plaintiff) brought suit, claiming that the nondelegation doctrine was violated when Congress gave enforcement power to a private company. The Department of Transportation (DOT) (defendant) argued that Amtrak was actually a governmental entity. The circuit court ruled in favor of AAR, pointing to a statute that designated Amtrak as a private entity. The DOT appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
Concurrence (Alito, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.