DeRolph v. State II

754 N.E.2d 1184 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DeRolph v. State II

Ohio Supreme Court
754 N.E.2d 1184 (2001)

DC

Facts

After years of prior litigation, the state of Ohio (defendant) adopted a new statutory formula for funding the state’s educational system to meet requirements set by the Ohio Supreme Court in prior decisions. The base-cost formula of House Bill (H.B.) 94 used 127 model school districts that met at least 20 of 27 statutory academic-performance standards to determine the cost of providing an adequate education per enrolled student in the state. The formula used wealth screens to remove school districts in the top and bottom 5 percent of income and property wealth from the pool of districts meeting adequate education standards and, because of rounding, included some districts that did not actually meet the statutory-performance criteria. Additionally, because of an echo effect, the state chose to use the lower of two fiscal years spending data for the calculation to adjust for districts that spent more than the base level due to line-item expenditures and outside revenue. The Ohio Supreme Court had continuing jurisdiction of the case and reviewed the state’s new formula.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moyer, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership