Deshotel v. Nicholson

457 F.3d 1258 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Deshotel v. Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
457 F.3d 1258 (2006)

Facts

James Deshotel (plaintiff) served in the United States Army from 1965 to 1969. During his service, he suffered a concussion and shoulder injuries in a car accident. In 1969, Deshotel filed a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) (defendant) for disability benefits for his shoulder injury and for residual-head-injury claims. He received a service connection for his shoulder but not for any head injury. In 1984, Deshotel filed an application to reopen his denied claim. In 1985, the VA granted service connection for post-head-trauma headaches. The decision did not specifically address any implied claim for psychiatric disabilities, and Deshotel did not appeal the decision. In 1999, Deshotel again sought to reopen his claim, including claims for memory loss and depression. The VA increased his rating for head trauma and headaches but denied a service connection for any psychiatric disability. Deshotel appealed, and the VA eventually granted him a service connection for psychiatric effects, effective from 1999. Deshotel appealed to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (the board), arguing that the benefit should date from 1984. The board held that the 1985 decision had implicitly denied such claims, and Deshotel appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (the veterans court). The veterans court dismissed Deshotel’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the 1985 decision constituted a final decision. Deshotel again appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership