Desmond v. Desmond
New York Family Court
509 N.Y.S.2d 979 (1986)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
William Desmond (plaintiff) and Jane Desmond (defendant) married three years after having their first child together. The Desmonds had a second child a few years after marrying. Throughout the marriage, William was severely abusive toward Jane and, to a lesser extent, the children. William also engaged in heavy drug use throughout the marriage and, on at least one occasion, offered drugs to the Desmonds’ daughter. In 1985, Jane left New York with the children and took refuge in Virginia. Jane did not disclose to William where she and the children were living for two months. William then petitioned the court for custody over the children on the ground that Jane had unilaterally left with the children and kept them from him. The court held a hearing on the matter. The court found that Jane had failed to communicate with William about the children, to encourage the children to have any contact with William, and to adequately respond to William’s drug use for the safety of the children. However, the court also found that Jane had suffered extreme abuse, which had negatively impacted the children, and had moved to Virginia to seek refuge from William’s abuse. The court then considered whether a parent who has unilaterally moved with the children out of the jurisdiction, thereby denying the other parent access to the children, may be penalized in the custody determination.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marlow, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.