Logourl black

Detroit Bank and Trust Co. v. Chicago Flame Hardening Co.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
541 F.Supp. 1278 (1982)


Facts

The owners of Chicago Flame Hardening Co. (Chicago Flame) (defendant) adopted a corporate resolution in 1964 pursuant to which Chicago Flame agreed to pay a monthly stipend to the widow of an owner upon his death. Roxanne Scott, now represented by her guardian Detroit Bank and Trust Co. (Detroit Bank) (plaintiff), was the wife of owner Marvin Scott. She was aware that the resolution provided a potential future benefit but did not act upon it or otherwise keep it in mind. In 1967, widow benefits were triggered for Marjorie Keeler, the wife of another owner, upon his death. Mrs. Scott was aware that Mrs. Keeler was receiving benefits. In 1971, Chicago Flame adopted another corporate resolution rescinding any future widow benefits for Mrs. Scott, as a means to bolster the company’s financial resources. Later that year, Marvin Scott died. Mrs. Scott did not learn of the rescission of her benefits until after his death. In 1977, Detroit Bank sued Chicago Flame to enforce the 1964 resolution on behalf of Mrs. Scott. The case was heard by the court, which issued findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Lee, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 81,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 11,364 briefs - keyed to 151 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now