Deutsche Bank
Germany Federal Court of Justice
7 March 1994 (1994)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
A general meeting of Deutsche Bank’s (defendant) shareholders resulted in the approval of a shareholders’ resolution (the resolution) allowing Deutsche Bank to issue new shares totaling 75,000,000 Deutsche marks to increase the number of non-German shareholders. Without the additional non-German shareholders, Deutsche Bank could not gain listings on foreign stock exchanges, including in the United States. The approved resolution provided that existing shareholders would not have preemptive rights to the new shares. A group of shareholders (the aggrieved shareholders) (plaintiffs) objected and filed an action against Deutsche Bank. Deutsche Bank asserted that the resolution was appropriate because Deutsche Bank’s expansion into foreign markets was in the corporation’s best interest, and no viable alternative to achieve the desired result existed. The regional court agreed with Deutsche Bank and dismissed the case. On appeal, the appellate court declared the resolution void because the resolution did not consider existing shareholder rights fairly. Deutsche Bank appealed to the Germany Federal Court of Justice. [Editor’s Note: The Germany Federal Court of Justice is Germany’s highest civil and criminal jurisdiction court.]
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.