Deutsche Shell Tanker Gesellschaft MBH v. Placid Refining Co.

993 F.2d 466 (1993)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Deutsche Shell Tanker Gesellschaft MBH v. Placid Refining Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
993 F.2d 466 (1993)

AR

Facts

A vessel owned by Deutsche Shell Tanker Gesellschaft MBH (Deutsche) (plaintiff) was transporting oil for Placid Refining Co. (Placid) (defendant) when it ran aground due to the failure of its radar system. The radar system failed because Deutsche had failed to keep it in working order. Even so, Deutsche brought a general-average claim against Placid, arguing that under a clause in its contract, Placid was still liable for contribution even if Deutsche had been negligent. Placid refused to pay, arguing that even if the contract had such a clause, as stated by Deutsche, Deutsche could not recover because the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act did not allow a vessel owner to bring a general-average claim if it failed to keep the vessel seaworthy. Deutsche sued, and the court ruled in Placid’s favor. Placid appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Politz, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership