Deutsche Shell Tanker Gesellschaft MBH v. Placid Refining Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
993 F.2d 466 (1993)

- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
A vessel owned by Deutsche Shell Tanker Gesellschaft MBH (Deutsche) (plaintiff) was transporting oil for Placid Refining Co. (Placid) (defendant) when it ran aground due to the failure of its radar system. The radar system failed because Deutsche had failed to keep it in working order. Even so, Deutsche brought a general-average claim against Placid, arguing that under a clause in its contract, Placid was still liable for contribution even if Deutsche had been negligent. Placid refused to pay, arguing that even if the contract had such a clause, as stated by Deutsche, Deutsche could not recover because the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act did not allow a vessel owner to bring a general-average claim if it failed to keep the vessel seaworthy. Deutsche sued, and the court ruled in Placid’s favor. Placid appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Politz, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.