Dew-Becker v. Wu

178 N.E.3d 1034, 2020 WL 1880804 (2020)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dew-Becker v. Wu

Illinois Supreme Court
178 N.E.3d 1034, 2020 WL 1880804 (2020)

Facts

Colin Dew-Becker (plaintiff) lost $100 to Andrew Wu (defendant) in a daily fantasy-sports (DFS) contest on the website FanDuel.com. Dew-Becker then sued Wu in Illinois state court, alleging that the DFS contest constituted illegal gambling under Illinois law. Dew-Becker sought to recover his lost $100 under Illinois Criminal Code § 28-8(a), which allowed the loser of an illegal bet to seek recovery from the winner. At a bench trial, Dew-Becker testified that he and Wu had paid $109 each to participate in a head-to-head DFS contest on FanDuel. Dew-Becker and Wu had each created a fantasy roster of nine National Basketball Association (NBA) players and earned points based on their players’ performances in real-world NBA games on a given day. Wu had outscored Dew-Becker and, as the winner, had received $200 (i.e., both participants’ entry fees, less $18 retained by FanDuel). The trial court entered judgment for Wu, and the appellate court affirmed. The appellate court explained that § 28-8(a) allowed recovery of gambling losses only if there was a direct connection between the people involved in the wager. The court concluded that because of FanDuel’s involvement as a third-party intermediary, there was no direct connection between Dew-Becker and Wu. Dew-Becker appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burke, C.J.)

Dissent (Karmeier, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership