Dews v. Halliburton Industries
Arkansas Supreme Court
708 S.W.2d 67 (1986)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Bruce Massey (defendant) contracted with Lyle Dews (defendant) to drill an oil well on Dews’s property. In return, Dews agreed that if the well produced oil in profitable quantity, he would share the profits with Massey. Massey subcontracted the drilling work, for hire, to Halliburton Industries, Inc. and others (subcontractors) (plaintiffs). Throughout the work phase, Dews intended to withhold Massey’s share of the profits for Massey’s perceived breach of an unrelated provision of their contract. Dews knew this would leave Massey unable to pay the subcontractors. The completed well proved productive. When neither Massey nor Dews paid the subcontractors for their work, the subcontractors sued. The trial court ruled in favor of the subcontractors, relying in part on the theory of quasi-contract. Dews appealed to the Arkansas Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holt, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
