Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co.

342 U.S. 359 (1952)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co.

United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 359 (1952)

Play video

Facts

Dice (plaintiff) was a railroad fireman employed by the Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad (the railroad) (defendant). Dice was injured while working. Dice sued the railroad in Ohio state court for negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). The railroad defended itself by claiming that Dice had signed a release of all his claims. Dice claimed that the railroad had falsely told him that the document he was signing was merely a receipt for backpay. The jury found for Dice. The trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which meant the trial judge overruled the jury verdict and entered judgment for the railroad. The trial judge’s basis for this action was that under Ohio state law, Dice was responsible for failing to read the release he had signed, regardless of what the railroad had told him. Dice appealed. The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed, ruling that federal law governed Dice’s federal claim. Under federal law, a fraudulent release was invalid, and a judge could not overrule a jury’s verdict that was supported by evidence. The railroad appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, which reversed and held that (1) state law controlled a case heard in state court and (2) under Ohio law, fraud issues were properly determined by the judge instead of the jury. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

Concurrence (Frankfurter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership