Dier v. Peters

815 N.W.2d 1 (2012)

From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dier v. Peters

Iowa Supreme Court
815 N.W.2d 1 (2012)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Cassandra Peters (defendant) gave birth to a child. Although Peters knew that Joseph Dier (plaintiff) was not the child’s biological father, Peters told Dier that he was the child’s father. Dier financially supported Peters and the child based on Peters’s representation that Dier was the child’s father. Dier filed an action for custody of the child. Peters was concerned that she would not be awarded custody and requested a paternity test. Two paternity tests established that Dier was not the child’s biological father. Dier sued Peters, alleging common-law fraud and seeking to recover the costs of supporting Peters and the child and litigating custody. Peters moved to dismiss the claim, arguing that Iowa does not recognize a cause of action for paternity fraud. The court granted Peters’s motion to dismiss. Dier appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mansfield, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 964,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,006 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms

  • Fraudulent MisrepresentationAn intentionally false statement of material fact that induces another to act and results in injury to the party relying on the statement.

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

Case book preview
Start your free 7-day trial