Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • D
  • Diesel Power Equipment, Inc. v. ADDCO, Inc.Diesel Power Equipment, Inc. v. ADDCO, Inc.
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Diesel Power Equipment, Inc. v. ADDCO, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth District
377 F.3d 853 (2004)


Diesel Power Equipment, Inc. (Diesel Power) (plaintiff), wished to purchase a division of ADDCO, Inc. (defendant) called Nicholson Engine Group (Nicholson). Diesel Power and Nicholson were both distributors of Deutz engines. Diesel Power began negotiating with ADDCO in early 2001, then sent ADDCO a preliminary offer letter that included the values of inventory, assets, and furniture that Diesel Power wished to purchase. The parties negotiated the amount Diesel Power would pay for goodwill. ADDCO accepted the offer, and Diesel Power drafted a letter of intent that included details regarding the treatment of accounts receivables and the value of certain assets. Diesel Power revised the letter of intent two times. In September, Diesel Power drafted an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) containing similar terms to the final letter of intent. ADDCO asked for changes in regard to how the purchase price was allotted between inventory and goodwill. In October, Diesel Power drafted a second APA that included a noncompete agreement valued at $50,000, allocated no funds to goodwill, and valued inventory differently than the earlier APA. Additionally, this agreement required that Deutz sign off on ADDCO assigning its distributorship contract to Diesel Power. Neither party signed either of the APAs. In late October, Interstate Companies, Inc. (Interstate), offered to buy Nicholson from ADDCO for nearly one million dollars more than Diesel Power’s offer. In November, ADDCO sold Nicholson to Interstate. Diesel Power sued ADDCO, alleging that ADDCO had agreed to sell Nicholson through the parties’ final letter of intent and had breached that contract. The district court found that the letter of intent constituted an agreement and that the subsequent APA did not materially alter the letter’s terms. The district court entered a judgment in favor of Diesel Power. ADDCO appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Hansen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial