Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
511 U.S. 863 (1994)
Facts
Digital Equipment (defendant), a company in the business of selling computer equipment, began marketing a new service called “Desktop Direct from Digital” in late 1991. Desktop Direct, Inc. (plaintiff), a company also in the business of selling computer equipment, sued Digital in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, alleging unlawful use of Desktop’s name. After negotiations, the two companies reached a settlement in March 1992. The agreement allowed Digital to continue to use the “Desktop Direct” name in exchange for a payment to Desktop. Desktop voluntarily dismissed the suit following the agreement. Months later, Desktop moved to vacate the dismissal, alleging that Digital misrepresented material facts while negotiating the dismissal. The district court granted the motion. Digital appealed the order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court of appeals held that the order neither ended the litigation nor constituted a collateral order. Digital appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 710,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
