Dilek v. Watson Enterprises, Inc.

885 F. Supp. 2d 632 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dilek v. Watson Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
885 F. Supp. 2d 632 (2012)

Facts

Watson Enterprises, Inc. (WEI) (defendant) operated a Mercedes-Benz dealership. Emel Dilek (plaintiff) began working for WEI in October 2005 pursuant to an employment contract. Dilek was hired by Ronald Pecunies, WEI’s chief operating officer and minority shareholder. Dilek and Pecunies were in a romantic relationship at the time. Dilek’s initial contract stated that, pursuant to WEI’s policy, her employment was at-will but that WEI could change Dilek’s employment terms. Over the next few years, Dilek received a promotion and multiple raises from WEI, as well as praise from Arthur Watson (WEI’s majority shareholder) and numerous certifications from Mercedes-Benz. Pecunies informed Dilek about her promotion and raises. Watson, who held superior power over Pecunies and who limited Pecunies’s ability to take certain employment actions, generally avoided involvement in Dilek-related employment matters due to the Dilek-Pecunies relationship. In 2009, Dilek signed a four-year contract with WEI, which Pecunies signed for WEI. Pecunies died in May 2010; WEI terminated Dilek three months later. Dilek sued WEI for breach of contract. WEI responded that (1) the 2009 contract was invalid because Pecunies did not have actual or apparent authority to enter into it and (2) Pecunies acted for his own benefit, and against WEI’s interest, in signing the 2009 contract because, among other things, Dilek spent most of her time shopping and travelling. The parties cross-moved for summary judgment with respect to Pecunies’s authority and whether Pecunies acted against WEI’s interest.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oetken, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership