Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
24 Cal. App. 4th 1426, 29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 746 (1994)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Jim Dill (plaintiff) sued Berquist Construction Company (Berquist) and Strata America (Strata) (defendants) for personal injuries. Both Berquist and Strata were corporations. Dill mailed a copy of the summons and complaint directly to Berquist in Oregon and Strata in Utah, with return receipt requested. Dill addressed the mail only to the corporations. No individual was listed. Kelly Nofziger signed for Bergquist’s receipt of the complaint, and L. Warner signed for Strata. Neither corporation filed any responsive pleadings, and Dill obtained a default judgment against Berquist and Strata for $200,000. Several months later, Berquist and Strata filed motions to dismiss the action. The corporations alleged that they had not been validly served during the three-year statutory window for service because Dill had not served any of the individuals listed in California Code of Civil Procedure § 416.10. Section 416.10 lists the individuals who may be served on behalf of a corporation. The trial court granted the motion. Dill appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKinster, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.