Dillard v. Chilton County Board of Education and Chilton County Commission
United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
699 F. Supp. 870 (1988)
- Written by Philip Glass, JD
Facts
Chilton County experienced pervasive racial polarization in elections. African Americans constituted 11.86 percent of Chilton County's population. The at-large electoral system for the county commission and board of education impinged on § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Thus, Chilton County devised a scheme to rectify this violation in the form of a settlement with aggrieved voters. A cumulative voting system would supersede the violative at-large system. This proposed system would establish a seven-member commission and a seven-member education board. Nevertheless, a cause of action commenced, alleging that the scheme failed to correct the § 2 violation. Aggrieved voters (plaintiffs) submitted that this plan fell short of proportionality. In its place, the aggrieved voters advanced a single-member redistricting scheme. A magistrate ruled in favor of the cumulative voting plan, which led to this appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
