DiMartino v. Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation
Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Court
No. MPTC-CV-PI-2014-174 (2017)
- Written by Alex Hall, JD
Facts
Anthony DiMartino (plaintiff) was outside a nightclub with his brother, who had been removed from the club for being intoxicated. The brother was belligerent and arguing with State Trooper Jason Deojay (the trooper). When the trooper initiated arrest of the brother, DiMartino stepped between them to intervene. Gary Coates (the officer), a police officer for the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (tribe) (defendant), who was watching from nearby, grabbed DiMartino and, using a maneuver not taught during officer training, swung him to the ground in less than four seconds. Surveillance video of the incident showed people leaving the nightclub close by during the altercation. DiMartino brought suit for negligence against the officer and the tribe under a theory of respondeat superior. DiMartino offered expert testimony that, although the officer’s initial act of grabbing was justified, the act of throwing DiMartino to the ground was a second, independent act of excessive force. Expert testimony introduced by the officer concluded that the maneuver constituted a single action. The officer personally testified that he grabbed DiMartino and pulled him away from the trooper and that the momentum of this pulling motion took them to the ground.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Londregan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.