United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
451 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1971)
Dindo (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident that occurred while he was driving a vehicle owned by Whitney (defendant). Allegedly, the vehicle left the road after Whitney attempted to reach a flashlight by placing his hand through the steering wheel as Dindo drove. The accident occurred in 1965, and Dindo brought a timely action against Whitney to recover damages for his injuries in 1968. However, prior to this action, Whitney sued Dindo in 1966 to recover for his own injuries sustained in the same accident. The same insurance policy covered both Dindo, as the driver, and Whitney, as the vehicle owner. Thus, the insurer defended Dindo in the original action, and he did not retain counsel of his own. He was unaware of his right to bring a counterclaim against Whitney in the original suit, and he did not do so. The insurance company settled the original case with Whitney. Dindo then retained his own attorney, and brought the present action against Whitney. On appeal, Dindo argued that the compulsory counterclaim rule should not apply to bar his claim against Whitney because the original action was settled, instead of disposed of upon final judgment, and because he was unaware that he was entitled to file a counterclaim until later.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Aldrich, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.