Dinuro Investments, LLC v. Camacho
Florida District Court of Appeal of the Third District
141 So. 3d 731 (2014)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Three limited-liability companies—Dinuro Investments, LLC (Dinuro) (plaintiff), Merici, LLC (Merici), and Starmac, LLC (Starmac)—together formed San Remo Homes, LLC (San Remo). Merici and Starmac were controlled by the natural persons Felisberto Camacho and Javier Macedo (defendants), respectively. San Remo issued promissory notes to a bank to finance real estate purchases. After San Remo fell into financial distress, Camacho and Macedo, but not Dinuro or its owners, caused other entities they controlled to purchase the San Remo notes from the bank. San Remo defaulted on the notes, and the entities that Camacho and Macedo controlled foreclosed on San Remo’s assets. The foreclosure destroyed any remaining value in Dinuro’s, Merici’s, and Starmac’s investment in San Remo. However, Camacho and Macedo, the natural persons who controlled Merici and Starmac, also controlled the entities that ended up with San Remo’s assets. Dinuro sued Camacho and Macedo, alleging that they wrongfully devalued San Remo. Dinuro sued in its individual capacity as opposed to bringing a derivative action on behalf of San Remo. The trial court dismissed the action, finding that Dinuro did not have standing to sue in its individual capacity. Dinuro appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rothenberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.