Dionne v. Bouley

757 F.2d 1344 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dionne v. Bouley

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
757 F.2d 1344 (1985)

Facts

Rose Dionne (plaintiff), the class representative, sought class certification in her action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Gerard Bouley, chief clerk of the district courts of the State of Rhode Island (defendant), challenging the constitutionality of Rhode Island’s post-judgment garnishment procedure. The putative class included all Rhode Island judgment debtors subject to the challenged procedures and whose funds may have been exempt in whole or in part under state or federal law. The district court denied class certification on the grounds that any injunctive or declaratory relief awarded would benefit all those similarly situated and would be identical regardless of whether the action proceeded as a class action. Dionne challenged the court’s denial of class certification. Dionne argued that the court erred in applying a necessity requirement to its class-certification analysis under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2).

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership