Diop v. ICE/Homeland Security
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
656 F.3d 221 (2011)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Cheikh Diop (plaintiff) was taken into custody by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (defendant) after having been twice convicted in Pennsylvania of a crime involving moral turpitude. Thereafter, proceedings to remove Diop from the United States began. Diop was subject to mandatory detention pursuant to § 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which did not provide for the possibility of release on bond. Diop was held for nearly three years. During that time, Diop’s case meandered through the administrative and judicial review process, from immigration judges to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and back and to various courts in Pennsylvania and back. Subsequently, Diop filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and others (collectively the Government) (defendants) in federal district court. The district court denied Diop’s petition. Diop appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fuentes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.