Direct Niche, LLC v. Via Varejo S/A

898 F.3d 1144 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Direct Niche, LLC v. Via Varejo S/A

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
898 F.3d 1144 (2018)

KL

Facts

Via Varejo S/A (defendant) was a Brazilian corporation and parent company to Casas Bahia, a multibillion-dollar retail brand with brick-and-mortar stores around the world and online operations. Via Varejo did not operate any physical stores in the United States or ship its products to the United States, but millions of internet users located in the United States accessed its Brazilian website each year. In addition to selling products to customers, Via Varejo made money through its website from advertisers, including ads purchased by major United States companies like Intel, Microsoft, and Dell. Via Varejo contracted with these companies to place their products for sale on its website in preferred locations as well as in banner advertisements. Direct Niche LLC (plaintiff) was a United States company that bought and sold domain names. Direct Niche bought the domain name casasbahia.com at an auction and began using it to make money through paid advertisements. Via Varejo filed a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) challenging Direct Niche’s use of the domain, and WIPO issued a ruling ordering Direct Niche to transfer the domain to Via Varejo. Rather than doing so, Direct Niche filed a lawsuit against Via Varejo in the United States, seeking a declaratory judgment that Direct Niche’s use and registration of casasbahia.com was not unlawful under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), which was intended to prevent the purchase of Internet domain names with a bad-faith intent to profit on a trademark holder’s goodwill. After a bench trial, the district court found that Via Varejo had appropriated ownership rights in the United States because it used the Casas Bahia trademark in commerce to provide advertising services for others and that Direct Niche had misappropriated Via Varejo’s ownership rights in violation of the ACPA. Direct Niche appealed, arguing that Via Varejo had not appropriated the Casas Bahia mark in the United States because it did not have a registered trademark there or sell products directly to or within the United States.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Howard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership