Director, United States Bureau of Mines v. Princess Elkhorn Coal Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
226 F.2d 570 (1955)
- Written by Alex Hall, JD
Facts
An inspector of the Federal Coal Mine Safety Board of Review (the board) conducted an inspection of a mine under the control of the Princess Elkhorn Coal Company (Elkhorn) (defendant) and found that the methane-gas levels exceeded the maximum allowed by the Federal Coal Mine Safety Act (the act). The act required that the air sample used to detect methane levels be taken no less than 12 inches from any “face” of coal. Elkhorn sought to void the inspector’s order, claiming that the sample was taken less than 12 inches from loose machine cuttings, which increased the methane reading. The director of the United States Bureau of Mines (director) (plaintiff) interpreted the term “face” to apply only to solid coal and not machine cuttings and refused to void the order. Elkhorn appealed to the board, which heard witness testimony that confirmed that the sample was taken roughly six inches above coal cuttings, and expert testimony that the term “face” applied to solid coal as well as loose machine-cut coal. In considering this testimony, the board members applied their own expertise in coal-mining matters to conclude that the inspector’s sample, taken less than 12 inches from cut coal, was noncompliant. The board saw no logical reason for Congress to distinguish loose coal from solid coal because both impacted the methane readings and, therefore, allowing inspections near machine cuttings would result in an excessive number of noncompliant mines. The board voided the inspection order, and the director sought review in the district court of appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Martin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.