Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stuard

901 N.E.2d 788 (2009)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stuard

Supreme Court of Ohio

901 N.E.2d 788 (2009)

Facts

Judge John Stuard and attorney Christopher Becker (plaintiffs) were the presiding judge and prosecutor in a capital murder trial. After the jury found the defendant guilty, Judge Stuard asked Becker to prepare and write the court’s sentencing opinion for the sentencing hearing. Becker drafted the opinion, Stuard reviewed it and noted corrections, and Becker made the corrections. Defense counsel was unaware of any of these communications until it became obvious at the sentencing hearing that the prosecutors had prior access to the sentencing opinion. A state disciplinary board (plaintiff) held that Stuard and Becker had violated the rules of judicial and professional conduct, and the case came before the supreme court of Ohio for determination of appropriate sanctions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership