Discover Bank v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
113 P.3d 1100 (2005)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Christopher Boehr (plaintiff) obtained a credit card from Discover Bank (defendant). Discover sent its cardholders an amendment to the cardholder agreement, adding an arbitration clause. The arbitration clause prohibited cardholders from participating in classwide arbitration. The amendment notice told cardholders that if they chose to not accept the amendment, they could terminate their Discover account. Boehr did not inform Discover of any objection to the clause and did not terminate his account. Approximately two years later, Boehr filed a class action suit in superior court, alleging that Discover engaged in a deceptive practice. Pursuant to the arbitration clause, Discover filed a motion to compel arbitration with Boehr individually and to dismiss the class action suit. The California Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moreno, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Baxter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.