DiSorbo v. Hoy

343 F.3d 172 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

DiSorbo v. Hoy

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
343 F.3d 172 (2003)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Rebecca DiSorbo (plaintiff) was arrested at a bar by a city police officer, Ronald Pedersen (defendant). DiSorbo claimed that she was arrested only after she rejected Pedersen’s personal advances. At the police station, Pedersen and two other officers, Matthew Hoy and Kenneth Hill (defendants) engaged in brutal acts of police aggression. According to DiSorbo, she was choked, slammed against a wall, thrown to the ground, and struck while defenseless on the floor. DiSorbo sued the officers and the city (defendant) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging excessive force, battery, and abuse of process. A jury found in favor of DiSorbo in her case against Pedersen and awarded punitive damages of $1.275 million. The $1.275 million punitive-damages award comprised $625,000 as to DiSorbo’s excessive-force claim and $650,000 as to her abuse-of-process claim. The jury also awarded $400,000 and nominal compensatory damages for DiSorbo’s excessive-force and abuse-of-process claims, respectively. The city was ordered to indemnify Pedersen. Pedersen and the city appealed, arguing that the punitive-damages award was excessive in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in BMW of North America v. Gore (Gore). Gore set forth three guideposts or factors for determining whether a punitive-damages award violated the Due Process Clause.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Katzmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership